{"id":24694,"date":"2022-05-31T15:44:21","date_gmt":"2022-05-31T19:44:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/?p=24694"},"modified":"2022-08-28T17:43:37","modified_gmt":"2022-08-28T21:43:37","slug":"climate-policy-loses-if-green-climate-fund-becomes-political-football","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/climate-policy-loses-if-green-climate-fund-becomes-political-football\/","title":{"rendered":"Climate Policy Loses If Green Climate Fund Becomes Political Football"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a global platform established to respond to climate change by investing in low-emission and climate-resilient development. The fund also assists vulnerable societies in adapting to the unavoidable impacts of climate change. Climate-related extremes have affected productivity in agriculture, forestry, and fisheries. Droughts, floods, wildfires, and marine heatwaves have affected food security, nutrition, and the livelihoods of millions.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The United States &#8212; responsible for a huge share of emissions causing this crisis \u2013included no money for the GCF in last year\u2019s budget, despite the efforts of UUSJ and its partners. The FY-2023 budget now under consideration provides an excellent opportunity to fulfill our moral responsibility to help poorer countries that are the least responsible for the emissions causing global warming. The Biden Administration\u2019s proposal of $1.6 billion for the Green Climate Fund for 2023 is a good start, though an actual fair share amount would be larger.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Last month, UUSJ\u2019s advocacy efforts urged lawmakers to support the administration\u2019s GCF proposal.\u00a0 Environmental Action Team (EAT) volunteers helped coordinated the <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Write Here! Write Now! <\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">campaign and UUSJ hosted <\/span><b>Joe Thwaites<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> from the World Resources Institute Sustainable Finance Center for an Expert Opinion Briefing (<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/wpbwSPq5tuk\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">video<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">), attended by more than 50 people.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">UUSJ also contacted members of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs, to learn why the GCF fell out of the FY-2022 budget and what can be done for the FY-2023 cycle. UUSJ met with Sens. Chris <\/span><b>Coons<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (D-DE), <\/span><i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Chair<\/span><\/i><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Dick <\/span><b>Durbin<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (D-IL), Jeff <\/span><b>Merkley<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (D-OR), and Marc <\/span><b>Rubio<\/b><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (R-FL).\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sen. Merkley &#8212; a champion of the fund &#8212; provided a <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/21.06.29-Climate-SFOPS.pdf\"><b>letter of support from the FY 22 cycle<\/b><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> (June 2021) and pledged to continue pushing for the GCF as a smart, solid, climate policy and program investment.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><strong>Special thanks to the Illinois UU State Action Network, which helped drive UU constituent participation for a nice showing with Sen. Durbin, and for showcasing how UU state actors and UUSJ can successfully collaborate to impact federal action.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">In our meetings, UUSJ learned that:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Supportive negotiators requested a \u201chigh topline [figure]\u201d intended to gain maximum support, but that a committee vote on the bill would strengthen the case for GCF funding later in the FY-23 appropriations process.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Republicans question the GCF\u2019s ability to underwrite projects in countries with complex relationships with the US such as China, Iran, North Korea, and Yemen. Republicans also see little return for American taxpayers, who are deeply concerned about job creation and the economy.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Democrats applaud the GCF and its approach to climate policy but concede its name includes political trigger terms &#8212; \u201cgreen\u201d and \u201cclimate\u201d \u2013 which can be a stumbling block for bipartisan support. They add that GCF funding would be a large part of the budget\u2019s non-military foreign spending, and foreign assistance programs. And supporters don\u2019t want to shut down the government for it as part of the appropriations process.\u00a0<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">UUSJ supports the GCF, its approach to climate policy, and its role in meeting U.S. moral obligation as the world\u2019s largest historical greenhouse gas emitter. The GCF can also potentially benefit U.S. firms active in the climate and green cluster as well as the knowledge, industry, and financing sectors.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">If you are interested in meeting with your Senator on this, please let us know by <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/forms\/d\/e\/1FAIpQLScImka7ixWJRGJ35L0bkb8gmddF3D9gszIdjqDLn5YZh_04uw\/viewform?usp=sf_link\"><strong>filling out this form<\/strong><\/a> or emailing (<\/span><a href=\"mailto:advocacy@uusj.org\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">advocacy@uusj.org<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">). <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Subcommittee Senators include: <\/span><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Sens. Patrick Leahy (D-VT)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Chris Murphy (D-CT)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) <\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Mitch McConnell (R-KY)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Roy Blunt (R-MO)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">John Boozman (R-AR)<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Jerry Moran (R-KS), and <\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Bill Hagerty (R-TN).<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is a global platform established to respond to climate change by investing in low-emission and climate-resilient development. The fund also assists vulnerable societies in adapting to the unavoidable impacts of climate change. Climate-related extremes have affected productivity in agriculture, forestry, and fisheries. Droughts, floods, wildfires, and marine heatwaves have affected &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/climate-policy-loses-if-green-climate-fund-becomes-political-football\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Climate Policy Loses If Green Climate Fund Becomes Political Football<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1967],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-24694","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-enews"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24694","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24694"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24694\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24715,"href":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24694\/revisions\/24715"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24694"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24694"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/uusj.net\/wp1\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24694"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}